§ 2. In imposing an aggregate fine, the court shall determine de novo the value of the daily fine, based on the recommendations specified in Article 33 § 3; the level of daily fines may not, however, exceed the previously determined amount thereof. § 3. In imposing an aggregate penalty of restriction of liberty, the court shall determine de novo the amount of supervised unremunerated work for community purposes, or the amount of deductions, when applying Article 35; the obligations specified in Article 36 § 2 shall be applied even if it was adjudicated for only one of the concurrent offences. Article 87. In the case of sentencing for the concurrent offences to the penalties of deprivation of liberty and restriction of liberty, the court shall impose an aggregate penalty, assuming that one month's restriction of liberty is equal to 15 days deprivation of liberty. Article 88. If the most severe penalty imposed for one of the concurrent offences is the penalty of 25 years of deprivation of liberty or deprivation of liberty for life, this penalty is imposed as the aggregate penalty; in the case of the aggregation of two or more penalties of 25 years of deprivation of liberty, the court may impose the penalty of deprivation of liberty for life as the aggregate penalty. Article 89. § 1. In the case of sentencing for concurrent offences to the penalties of deprivation of liberty, restriction of liberty or fine with or without a conditional suspension of execution, the court may conditionally suspend the execution of the aggregate penalty if the conditions specified in Article 69 are met. § 2. In imposing an aggregate penalty of deprivation of liberty or restriction of liberty with a conditional suspension of their execution, the court may impose a fine as specified in Article 71 § 1, even if it has not been imposed for the concurrent offences. 31