Article 44. § 1. The court shall impose the forfeiture of items directly derived from an offence, unless they are subject to return to the injured person or to another entity. § 2. The court may decide on the forfeiture of the items which served or were designed for committing the offence unless they are subject to the return to another entity. § 3. The forfeiture described in § 2 shall not be applied if its imposition would not be commensurate with the severity of the offence committed, the court may impose a supplementary payment to the State Treasury. § 4. In the event that the perpetrator has intentionally prevented the possibility of imposing the forfeiture of items specified in §§ 1 or 2, the court may impose the obligation to pay a pecuniary equivalent of their value. § 5. In the event that the conviction has pertained to an offence of violating a prohibition of production, possession or dealing in or transporting specific items, the court may decide on the forfeiture thereof. § 6. If the items referred to in §§ 2 or 5 are not the property of the perpetrator, the forfeiture may be decided by the court only in the cases provided for in law; in the case of co-ownership, the decision shall cover only the forfeiture of the share owned by the perpetrator, or the obligation to pay a pecuniary equivalent of its value. § 7. Property which is the subject of forfeiture shall be transferred to the ownership of the State Treasury at the time the sentence becomes final and valid. Article 45. In the case of sentencing the perpetrator referred to in Article 65, the court may decide on forfeiture of the material benefits gained, even indirectly, from the offence. Article 46. § 1. In the case of conviction for causing death, serious detriment to health, disturbance to the functioning of a bodily organ or disturbance to health, an offence against safety in traffic or an offence against the environment, property or commerce, the court, upon a motion from the injured 15