CHAPTER TWO: THE GLOBAL PICTURE
exhaustive but covers the main sources of information that have some degree of cross-national
comparability. Other sources include individual studies on selected phenomena, such as URL
crawling techniques, or botnet takeover.8 Annex Two to this Study examines the strengths and
challenges associated with each source in turn. It finds that, at present, while police-recorded
cybercrime statistics are valuable for national-level crime prevention and policy making, they are not
generally suitable for cross-national comparisons in the area of cybercrime. In contrast, survey-based
information and technology-based cybersecurity information is beginning to provide some insights
into the nature and extent of the phenomenon. These information sources are used below to
address the questions of ‘what’ and ‘how much’ cybercrime. The question of ‘who’ is examined in the
following section of this Chapter on cybercrime perpetrators.
2.2 The global cybercrime picture
Key results:
Cybercrime acts show a broad distribution across financial-driven acts, computercontent related acts, as well as acts against the confidentiality, integrity and accessibility
of computer systems
Perceptions of relative risk and threat vary between Governments and businesses
Individual cybercrime victimization is significantly higher than for ‘conventional’ crime
forms. Victimization rates for online credit card fraud, identify theft, responding to a
phishing attempt, and experiencing unauthorized access to an email account, vary
between 1 and 17 per cent of the online population
Individual cybercrime victimization rates are higher in countries with lower levels of
development, highlighting a need to strengthen prevention efforts in these countries
Private sector enterprises in Europe report victimization rates of between 2 and 16 per
cent for acts such as data breach due to intrusion or phishing
Criminal tools of choice for these crimes, such as botnets, have global reach. More than
one million unique IP addresses globally functioned as command and control servers
for botnets in 2011
Internet content targeted for removal by governments includes child pornography and
hate speech, but also defamation and government criticism, raising human rights law
concerns in some cases
Some estimates place the total global proportion of internet traffic estimated to infringe
copyright at almost 24 per cent
This section paints a picture of the global nature and extent of cybercrime on the basis of
data provided during information gathering for the Study from countries, private sector and
academic organizations, as well as a review of over 500 open-source publications.9
8
9
See for example, Kanich, C. et al., 2011. No Plan Survives Contact: Experience with Cybercrime Measurement. Available at:
http://static.usenix.org/events/cset11/tech/final_files/Kanich.pdf ; see also Kemmerer, R.A., 2011. How to Steal a Botnet and What
Can Happen When You Do. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6080765
Sources on file with the Secretariat.
25