Ne. 25] Interception of Communications (5) For the purposes of this section “relevant period” means a period of up to six months as specified by the Judge beginning with the date of the issuance of the interception direction or, in the case of an interception direction that has been renewed, the date of its latest renewal. 9. (1) Anentry warrant shall not be issued by a Judge unless there exists with respect to the premises to which the application for an entry warrant relates, arelated interception direction. (2) Where the Director of Public Prosecutions: (a) makes an application for an interception direction on behalf of an authorised officer pursuant to section 5, the Director of Public Prosecutions may at the time of making the application, also apply to the Judge for the issuance of an entry warrant with respect to the premises to which the interception direction relates; or (b) made an application for an interception direction on behalf of an authorised officer pursuant to section 5, the Director of Public Prosecutions may, at any such stage after the issuance of the interception direction in respect of which such an application was made, but before the expiry of the period or the extended period for which it has been issued, apply ex parte to a Judge for the issuance of an entry warrant with respect to the premises to direction relates. (3) warrant which the interception Subject to section 10, an application for an entry referred to in subsection prescribed form and shall: (2), shall be in the Condition for issuance of entry etc. warrant,