Papua New Guinea Cybercrime Policy 2014
6.
Liability
of
ICT
Service
Providers
The
Government
recognises
that
cybercrime
cannot
be
committed
without
the
use
of
services
and
networks
provided
by
ICT
service
providers
who
receive,
store
or
transmit
large
volumes
of
content
on
behalf
of
their
subscribers.
Accordingly,
it
is
necessary
to
impose
some
degree
of
responsibility
and
or
liability
on
ICT
service
providers.
However,
the
Government
acknowledges
that
it
is
practically
impossible
for
ICT
service
providers
to
monitor
the
content
in
order
to
be
held
responsible
and
or
liable
for
merely
receiving,
storing
or
transmitting
illegal
data,
unless
they
knowingly
aid
or
abet
the
offender,
or
are
criminally
negligent
in
their
performance
or
discharge
of
any
duty
or
obligation.
ICT
service
providers
play
an
important
role
in
making
the
Internet
accessible
to
users.
It
is
important
to
establish
a
reliable
legal
and
regulatory
framework
defining
the
obligations
of
ICT
Service
Providers
in
the
country,
whereby
the
responsibility
and
or
liability
for
crimes
committed
by
users
of
their
services
should
be
restricted
where
necessary.
In
this
context,
it
is
essential
to
distinguish
between
the
different
types
of
service
providers.
In
cases
where
responsibility
and
or
liability
exists,
legislation
should
limit
the
criminal
responsibility
and
or
liability
of
Internet
Service
Providers
(ISPs)
and
or
Access
Providers
on
offences
committed
by
users
of
their
service,
if
the
ICT
provider
–
•
did
not
initiate
the
transmission;
•
did
not
select
the
receiver;
and
•
did
not
modify
the
information
contained
in
the
transmission.
The
criminal
responsibility
of
Caching
Providers
should
likewise
be
limited,
if
liability
exists,
for
the
automatic,
intermediate
and
temporary
storage
of
information.
Similarly,
responsibility
and
or
liability
for
Hosting
Providers
should
be
limited
by
the
framework,
in
cases
where
the
provider
has
no
actual
knowledge
about
the
existence
of
illegal
data
or
immediately
removes
them
upon
acquiring
such
knowledge.
Legislation
should
also
specify
the
responsibility
and
or
liability
of
Search
Engine
Providers
and
Hyperlink
Providers.
As
part
of
the
terms
and
conditions
of
their
license,
ICT
service
providers
shall
have
interception
capabilities
and
to
bear
the
costs
of
assisting
in
investigations
in
using
such
capabilities.
Given
the
qualified
degree
of
responsibility
for
ICT
service
providers,
legislation
should
prescribe
if
and
for
what
period
of
time,
ICT
service
providers
need
to
preserve
data
and
or
content.
Further,
the
Government
considers
it
necessary
that
ICT
service
providers
be
obligated
to
report
suspicious
behaviour
and
to
require
a
registration
prior
to
making
their
services
available.
P | 21