Russia, too, will continue to claim major power
status. Moscow’s foreign policy is founded on a
nationalist narrative that is critical of the West and
challenges the liberal order.
Moscow’s power is primarily based on Russian military strength. Russia is no longer among the world’s
ten largest economies. Its current GDP is comparable to South Korea’s, Spain’s or Australia’s. Reforms
and a rapprochement with the West could potentially stem Russia’s relative loss of economic power, but no such domestic and foreign policy adjustments appear to be on the horizon.
Given the strained global political climate, there
are expectations that Europe should move closer
together. A united Europe could become a world
power. This is in fact one the European Union’s
stated objectives. But centrifugal forces are also at
work in Europe.
The EU is an economic power and European countries remain global leaders when it comes to quality
of life. But internal fault lines will continue to be a
major concern for the EU in the foreseeable future.
The EU’s biggest players are facing major domestic
political problems. Protest movements are challenging the European integration process as it is presently constituted. The EU is rarely able to live up to its
potential as a foreign policy actor. Its member states
disagree on too many key issues. Calls for ‘strategic
autonomy’ and ‘European sovereignty’ remain rather theoretical for the time being.
Whether the trend is towards ‘more Europe’ or ‘less
Europe’ is as yet unclear. Despite this uncertainty, or
rather because of it, the single market with its four
freedoms at the heart of the European integration
process is likely to endure. EU member states will in
all likelihood also continue to coordinate within the
framework of the EU their efforts to ensure Europe’s
internal security and global competitiveness.
It also remains to be seen whether the West, as a
transatlantic community of values, will be able to
retain its power to shape policymaking. The language coming from Washington gives little room
for optimism in the short term. It is clear, however,
that Europe and the United States will continue to
need each other in the global political landscape of
the future. We should therefore not be too hasty in
writing off the West just yet.
2.1.2. The international order
under pressure
The growing prominence of non-Western values
has led to an erosion of the liberal international
order. The rule of law, democracy and human
rights are on the defensive. International law is
under pressure. Freedom of expression is being
curtailed in many countries. Facts are countered
with pseudo-facts with alarming frequency –
not only in autocratic countries. It is too early to
tell whether this trend is a temporary setback or
whether decades of progress have been irretrievably lost.
The weakening of the international order is also
evidenced by the fact that arms control treaties are being flouted: we are witnessing a trend
towards rearmament. A future arms race between
China, the United States and Russia with regional
spillover effects cannot be ruled out. Strategic stability is difficult to achieve in a multipolar world.
We are already facing the ever-present risk of the
misuse of cyberspace for geopolitical, intelligence
and military purposes.
Numerous multilateral organisations are struggling to maintain their capacity to act because
of growing divergences between their member
states. The law of the strongest is gaining ground,
especially in security and trade relations. The US
historian and foreign-policy commentator Robert
Kagan encapsulated this trend in the title of his
2018 book The Jungle Grows Back.
Kagan’s argument overreaches, however: multilateralism is not finished, but it is changing and
increasingly fragmented. Governance structures
are becoming more diverse, with sometimes
competing and overlapping interests.
New cooperation networks are also emerging, for
example between cities. Rapid worldwide urbanisation is turning cities into key players in efforts
to address climate, energy and migration issues.
Digitalisation is enhancing non-governmental
actors’ ability to shape developments. This trend
also places limits on nation states’ ability to reassert their sway.
A stable new global order is unlikely to emerge
any time soon from this tangled web. For small
and medium-sized countries like Switzerland,
whose prosperity and security depend on a rulesbased system, these trends pose a real challenge.
Protecting its interests will become much
more challenging for Switzerland in the
years ahead.
The world in 2028 – what do we have to prepare for?
4
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents