PART 4 PROCEDURES (b) - aperson specified by the Court, the Court may attach conditions that it considers necessary to avoid, as far as practicable, the interception of information or recording or observi ng of activities. of a professional character to which the lawyer, clereyman, medical practitioner or such other person specified by the Court is a party. (5) To avoid doubt, an interception warrant is not limited to a particular premise, and can apply in relation to an interception device designed to intercept communications, or observe or record activities involving a person wherever that person may be. 30 (1) Granting of an interception warrant The Court may grant an interception warrant if it is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds: (a) _ to suspect that a person is planning, participating in or committing, or has planned, participated in or committed, a specified offence; and (b) __ to believe that evidence relevant to the investigation of a case will be obtained through the use of an interception warrant to intercept private communications, records or observe activities; and {c) _ the proposed interception is justified by the social harm of the suspected offence against which it is directed, (2) In addition to subsection (1), the Court, prior to granting an intercep tion warrant, must consider the following: (a) _ (b) _ the seriousness of the offence to which the criminal investigation or proceeding relates; and the reliability of the information on which the application is based, including the nature of the source of the information; and (c) ifthe public interest in the production of data from the computer system or data storage medium outweighs the tight to privacy of a person, whose privacy may be affected as a result of the production; and (Q “if there is sufficient connection between the evidence sought and the offence to which the criminal investigation or proceeding relates; and Cybercrime Act No. 22 of 2021 , 27