50 funding the activities of such person in relation to those procedures; and (c) Judicial review 31. (1) _ whether the outcomes achieved or likely to be achieved through self-regulation are materially different from the outcomes that would have been likely to have resulted from a determination, order or direction of the Telecommunications Commission. This Act does not affect any right to apply to the High Court for judicial review of a determination, order or direction of the Telecommunications Commission, or a determination or order of a Dispute and Appeal Panel. (2) Where any determination , order or direction of the Telecommunications Commission or determination or order of a Dispute and Appeal Panel is subject to judicial review proceeding, it shall remain in full force pending the determination of such proceeding unless the Court orders to the contrary. , Exemption of liability 32. (1) The Minister, the members of the Evaluation Committee, the Telecommunications Commission, the commissioner, Secretary, mediator engaged or Pane] member appointed under Part17 in connection with a dispute and an officer, employee, agent or consultant of the Telecommunications Commission, shall not be subject to any action, liability, claim or demand or be liable for any matter or thing done or omitted to be done in good faith (whether negligently or not), in the performance or for any purported performance of any function or duty, or exercise or purported exercise of any power under this Act. (2) No costs order Telecommunications appeal of, or judicial determination, order Telecommunications (3) may be made against the Commission in connection with an review proceeding concerning, any or direction except where the Commission appeals under this Act. Nothing in this section shall prohibit— (a) an appeal under section 42(2), 59(2), 103(b) or 110; (b) the making of an application to the High Court for leave to apply for judicial review of a determination, order or direction of the Telecommunications Commission; or