EXERCISE TYPOLOGY AND DESIGN
capabilities, via interaction between these two
specific levels. Nowadays it is not possible to
strictly separate the technical world from the
political or strategic.
Since this is a rather advanced model of
exercise, it is worth deploying it only after you
have gained enough experience with technical
and table-top exercises. Hybrid exercises can
realistically only accomplish positive outcomes
when they are properly prepared, and when
the operational level (and the sum of its
outcomes) is logically linked to a strategic
intent, and vice versa. This might be very
challenging,
especially
when
linear
development on the technical layer does not
correspond to the time-based nonlinear
aspects of decision making at the strategic
level. Unlike cyber-attacks, decision making often burdened by bureaucracy - might seem
to be too slow.
The cyber defense exercise Locked Shields,
organized by NATO CCD COE, might serve
as a good inspiration and example of a hybrid
exercise (https://ccdcoe.org/locked-shields2017.html).
Note: Hybrid exercises should not be confused
with the concept of hybrid as the nature of a
threat (combining kinetic operations with
irregular and cyber warfare).
The type and scope of an exercise should be
selected based on available resources and
exercise objectives to be achieved.
EXERCISE DESIGN
Design questions should be dealt with after the
exercise type is outlined, in order to drive
subsequent planning steps. Design decisions
must go hand in hand with the basic objectives
of the exercise. E.g.:
Do we want to test the IT security team’s
speed to recognize, analyze and respond
to a cyber incident?
Will the exercise test the roles of law
enforcement, the intelligence community
and military bodies, as well as their
coordination and information exchange
procedures during crisis?
What else must be decided before we start
planning?
Here are examples of questions worth
addressing during the initial planning stage, in
order to select the right exercise concept.
Will the exercise simulate reality by
running 24/7, or will it be phased over a
two-day/one-week period condensed into
a very busy 6-hour exercise, where a few
hours reflects some pre-determined time
passage?
Is the exercise aimed at practicing crisis
management only during office hours, or
conversely, does the exercise intend to test
readiness outside of working hours, or
even during the weekend?
What other specific tasks, functions, roles,
or activities does the exercise intend to
evaluate?
What are all the components that could be
simulated in order to make the exercise
authentic?
What hardware or equipment does the
exercise require – computers, phones,
mock news reports or any other tools?
Is an exercise team/unit present in your
institution? What is the maturity level of
that team? Do they have any experience
with conducting the selected type of
exercise? How much time do they need to
get
familiar
with
the preparation mechanism/exercise
lifecycle?
The optimal length of a table-top exercise is
around 60-90 minutes (excluding break time).
7/29