Resolution of Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus "Abo…tate program of development of digital economy and information..." 05/10/2022, 16:14 - planned i-go value of target indicator of task of the subprogramme of the State program in reporting year; Ki - the coefficient considering extent of influence of external and internal factors of risk on achievement of planned value of target indicator. It is necessary to consider that when evaluating efficiency of the solution of task of the subprogramme of the State program in numerator calculations for target indicators which values in reporting year are equal to zero are not made, however their total quantity in denominator is considered. Value of coefficient Ki is determined by calculation of the relation of difference of planned and actual parameter values characterizing the course of accomplishment of the State program on which the significant effect, to its planned value in reporting year appears risk factor: where Ki - the coefficient considering extent of influence of external and internal factors of risk on achievement of planned value of target indicator; - the actual parameter value which changes owing to risk factor action, led to variation of the actual i-go value of target indicator of task of the subprogramme of the State program from its planned value in reporting year; - planned parameter value on which risk factor can exert impact. At the same time in case of identification of simultaneous influence on achievement of planned value of target indicator of two and more risk factors value of coefficient Ki is determined as the amount of the coefficients considering influence of each factor for calculation of their cumulative impact. If the received Et value: it is more or equally in 0,9, that solution of task in reporting year is considered executed with outstanding performance; is in the range from 0,9 to 0,8, that solution of task of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered executed effectively; is in the range from 0,8 to 0,65, that solution of task of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered executed well; it is less than 0,65, that the course of accomplishment of task of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered unsatisfactory. At the second stage the efficiency evaluation of accomplishment of subprogrammes of the State program based on determination of degree of the solution of the tasks set in each subprogramme on formula is performed where - efficiency of accomplishment of the subprogramme of the State program in reporting year; m - quantity of tasks in the subprogramme of the State program; - efficiency of accomplishment of j-y of task of the subprogramme of the State program in reporting year. If the received Epp value: it is more or equally to 0,9, that the subprogramme is executed in reporting year with outstanding performance; is in the range from 0,9 to 0,8, that accomplishment of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered effective; is in the range from 0,8 to 0,65, that accomplishment of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered satisfactory; it is less than 0,65, that the course of accomplishment of the subprogramme in reporting year is considered unsatisfactory. At the final stage the efficiency of accomplishment of the State program in general in reporting year proceeding from efficiency of accomplishment of its subprogrammes and summary target indicators characterizing goal achievement of the State program calculated on formula is evaluated https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=85202 Page 4 of 6