116 Telecommunications Act 2005 2005, No.20 (c) that an action or activity of a service provider under sections 27 or 28 are authorized and shall not be considered to contravene this Act, on the grounds that such actions or activities are in the public interest and are otherwise consistent with the objectives set out in section 3. 30. Remedies for Abuse of Dominance and AntiCompetitive Practices-(1) If the Regulator determines that the actions or activities of a service provider constitute an abuse of the service provider‟s dominant position or an anti-competitive practice within the meaning of this Act or a regulation or rule, the Regulator may issue an order to: (a) require one or more persons named in the order to take one or more of the following actions: (i) cease the actions or activities specified in the order immediately, or at such time specified in the order, and subject to such conditions specified in the order; (ii) make specific changes in actions or activities specified in the order, as a means of eliminating or reducing the abusive or anti-competitive impact; and/or (b) impose a financial surcharge not exceeding SAT$100,000 on a service provider whose actions constitute: (i) an abuse of the service provider‟s dominant position; or (ii) an anti-competitive practice; and/or (c) require the service provider involved in the abusive action or activity or anti-competitive practice and any persons affected by such action, activity or practice to meet and attempt to determine remedies to prevent or eliminate continuation of such action, activity or practice, and to resolve any remaining dispute; and/or (d) require the service provider responsible for the abusive or anti-competitive action or activity specified in the order to publish an