2005, No.20 Telecommunications Act 2005 113 specifying the markets in which such providers have been designated to be dominant. (4) Orders designating dominant service providers shall specify and define the relevant markets for which a service provider is designated to be dominant and the circumstances relied on by the Regulator to support any findings regarding dominance. 27. Abuse of Dominance-A dominant service provider is prohibited from undertaking activities or actions that abuse the service provider‟s dominant position, and for the purposes of this section the following types of actions and activities shall be considered an abuse of dominant position: (a) failing to supply essential facilities to a competitor within a reasonable time after a request and on reasonable conditions, or discriminating in the provision of interconnection or other telecommunications service providers; except under circumstances that are objectively justified based on differences in supply conditions, including different costs or a shortage of available facilities or resources; (b) bundling of telecommunications services, whereby the service provider requires, as a condition of supplying a service to a competitor, that the competitor does not require; (c) offering a competitor more favourable terms or conditions that are not justified by cost differences if the competitor acquired another service that the competitor does not require; (d) pre-emptively acquiring or securing scarce facilities or resources, including but jot limited to rights of way, required by another service provider for the operation of such service provider‟s business, with the effect of denying the use of the facilities or resources to such service provider; (e) supplying competitive telecommunications services at prices below long run average incremental