require any person concerned to assist him in his investigations, including giving him access codes. Clause 22 would require the police to make a record of and allow access to seized data. Clause 23 would provide for a magistrate to be able to order production of data required for the purpose of a criminal investigation or criminal proceedings. Clause 24 would allow a magistrate to authorize a police officer to collect or record traffic data associated with a specified communication during a specified period through application of technical means where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that traffic data is reasonably required for the purposes of a criminal investigation. Clause 25 would provide for the preservation of data where data stored in a computer system is reasonably required for the purposes of a criminal investigation; and where there is a risk that the data may be destroyed or rendered inaccessible. Clauses 26 and 27 would provide that a judge can order an internet service provider to intercept electronic communications and data traffic where necessary for criminal investigations. Clause 28 would make provisions for evidence. Clause 29 would make provisions with respect to confidentiality and limitation of liability of internet service providers. Clause 30 would provide that a person can be prosecuted for an offence, except an offence under section 9, 11, 12, 14 or 15 within two years from the date the offence was committed. A person can be prosecuted for an offence under sections 9, 11, 12, 14 or 15 within six years from the date the offence was committed 22