B. Promoting reform of prosecution bodies, exclusion of political influence and increasing transparency of their activity 1. To ensure the implementation of EU standards in the activity of prosecution. 2. To promote the implementation of Prosecution Reform Concept as priority, including by: - approving in second reading the Law on prosecution; - strengthening prosecution’s self-management institutions as guarantor of independence of prosecutors and ensuring the financial independence (autonomy) of prosecution and self-management bodies (similar to magistrates); - ensuring a correct process when selecting, promoting, assessing and holding disciplinary liable prosecutors; - specifying the competences of prosecution in the criminal area and relations with other state institutions competent in the criminal investigation field; - reviewing the notification to the prosecution by the public institutions and servants in order to limit the foreign influence on the institution and management of penal cases (non-admitting political and administrative discussions, request by third parties of data and taking measures on concrete criminal cases in line with the decisions of the Constitutional Court and procedural law); - implementing a uniform practice as to adopt legal solutions when carrying out the activity by prosecution, especially during the criminal trial; - optimising the map of prosecutions with the one of judges and appropriate providing with staff and technical conditions (premises, equipment, cars, financial resources for expertise, enquiring commissions, translations, summoning); - increasing the procedural independence of prosecutors and setting clear rules which to regulate the relations with higher ranking prosecutors, in particular as to take over and distribute criminal cases; - continuing prosecutor specialty practices on specific causes; - reviewing the functioning of specialised prosecutions, including by establishing structures competent and specialised in fighting organised crime (criminal groups, offences against state’s security, terrorism, contraband, economic and financial offences, cybercrimes, trafficking); - implementing a system of institutional and individual responsibility, in parallel with relating the salary of prosecutors with the one of magistrates (judges); - developing an information system designed for prosecution, criminal investigation bodies and courts, in order to ensure the gradual passing to „e-Dossier” concept; - changing the procedure of appointing the prosecutor general in order to ensure the latter’s independence and exclude any political influence; 32