DEFENCE WHITE PAPER
41.
The MAF has recognised cyber electromagnetic as a new operational domain. This domain
provides critical capabilities that enables the MAF to conduct operations safely across all other
domains.
42.
The usage of Unmanned Systems such as drones as destructive weapons has become a more
widespread practice. In September 2019, an attack employing drones was launched against
Saudi oil processing facilities. Meanwhile, rebel groups in Syria had executed multiple
strikes on military bases utilising drones with explosive payloads. Such incidents prove that
these threats are a reality that we must confront.
43.
For the purpose of military operations, the combination of cyber operations with Electronic
Warfare (EW) capabilities forms up the Cyber Electromagnetic Activities (CEMA) efforts to
protect CNII. EW is a promising countermeasure element in combating drones of all sizes and
mission profiles. Defence can be carried out through EW to disrupt the navigational system,
communication, fuses and weapon trigger functions, and may potentially take over the control
of the drones.
44.
In the near future, a combination of weapons and AI technology will pose a new threat to the
nation. Potentially, AI will not only increase the efficiency and lethal effect of kinetic weapons,
but also guide weapons. Such AI-guided weapons, defined as Autonomous Weapons Systems
(AWS), can independently select and attack targets without human intervention. Therefore, the
current MAF doctrine dictates CEMA in supporting other military operations
that will face these new threats.
45.
Since cyber security threats are transnational in nature, overcoming the threats necessitates
regional and global level cooperation. Therefore, it is necessary for ASEAN member states to
implement practical confidence-building measures and adopt a set of common, voluntary and
non-binding norms of responsible state behaviour in cyber space. The measures taken are also
to enhance member states’ trust and confidence in the use of cyber space to its full potential to
bring about greater regional economic prosperity and integration.
46.
Maritime Security Threats. Sea robbery and piracy have long been threats to ships and
seafarers sailing through Malaysian waters. These threats have led to the formation of
multilateral initiatives such as the MSP and TCA that aims to eradicate sea robbery and piracy
effectively. The Government has also established the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency
(MMEA), to overcome increasing maritime security threats. Non-traditional threats, like kidnap
for ransom, smuggling, human trafficking and other illegal activities in the maritime domain have
brought about more challenges to Malaysia. For example, the Kidnap for Ransom Group
(KFRG) and Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) actively abduct hostages from the eastern coast of Sabah to
extort ransoms for their release. Thus, closer cooperation between Malaysia and neighbouring
countries, international maritime organisations as well as the private sectors is important to
overcome all these threats.
47.
Rampant illegal fishing activity is another maritime security threat to the nation. This issue
has impacted the national economy and complicated efforts to ensure a sustainable
fisheries industry in the MMZ. Every year, Malaysia loses up to RM6 billion due to illegal
fishing activities. Approximately 980 thousand tonnes of the country’s sea-based produce
is lost annually. It adversely affects biodiversity, associated and dependent species and the
wider ecosystem. Encroachment by foreign fishing vessels undermines Malaysia’s economy,
security and sovereignty. The Government is currently tackling this issue through
collaboration between maritime enforcement agencies involving integrated operations such as
Op Naga conducted in the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia.
27
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents