2005, No.20 Telecommunications Act 2005 121 (c) misleading or coercing a party into reaching an agreement the party would not otherwise have made; (d) interfering in any way with a service provider‟s ability to communicate with the Regulator, including having a service provider sign a nondisclosure agreement that preludes the service provider from providing information requested by the Regulator; or (e) refusing to permit amendment of the interconnection agreement to take into account changes in circumstances, including changes to this Act, a regulation or rule. (3) Where the Regulator has not made an order otherwise, a service provider shall not be required to enter into an interconnection agreement on terms that would, in the service provider‟s reasonable opinion: (a) cause or be likely to cause material danger, damage or injury to any person or to any property; (b) cause material damage or otherwise interfere with the operation of the service provider‟s facilities or the provision of the service provider‟s telecommunication services; or (c) not be reasonable, having regard to technical or economic constraints. (4) Service providers and other interested parties may at any time request the Regulator to issue an order that clarifies or interprets the interconnection rights or obligations set out in this Act, a regulation, rule or order. 34. Interconnection by Dominant Service Providers-(1) Sections 35, 36, 37 and 38 apply only to service providers that the Regulator has designated as dominant service providers for interconnection purposes in one or more telecommunications markets. (2) The Regulator may issue an order to designate a service provider as being a dominant service provider for interconnection purposes in one or more telecommunications markets if the Regulator considers that: