A/75/123 Voluntary confidence-building measures Colombia is deeply committed to continuing to develop and adopt measures to enhance confidence and security in cyberspace. Relevant work has been done at the regional level through OAS. In April 2017, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and the United States led the adoption of the resolution on the establishment of a working group on cooperation and confidence-building measures in cyberspace in the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism of OAS. In February 2018, Colombia was elected Chair of the working group. At the group’s second meeting, which took place in Chile in April 2019, Chile succeeded Colombia as Chair. The confidence-building measures adopted by OAS in the area of cybersecurity are as follows: 1. Provide information on national cybersecurity policies, such as national strategies, white papers, legal frameworks and other documents that each member State considers relevant; 2. Identify a national point of contact at the policy level able to discuss the implications of hemispheric cyberthreats; 3. Designate points of contact, in the event that none exist, within ministrie s of foreign affairs, with the purpose of facilitating the work on international cooperation and dialogue in cybersecurity and cyberspace; 4. Develop and strengthen capacity-building through activities such as seminars, conferences, workshops on cyberdiplomacy for public and private sector officials; 5. Foster the inclusion of subjects related to cybersecurity and cyberspace into training courses for diplomats and officials of ministries of foreign affairs and other government agencies; 6. Foster cooperation and the exchange of best practices related to cyberdiplomacy, cybersecurity and cyberspace through the establishment of working groups, other dialogue mechanisms and the signing of agreements among States. In particular, the confidence-building measures related to cyberdiplomacy represent an important contribution that is being made through OAS. Through cyberdiplomacy, it is possible to identify ways to address cybersecurity challenges. This not only requires promoting the active participation of St ates in international debates on cybersecurity, an objective which, in turn, involves providing relevant training to diplomatic officials, but also requires ensuring the active participation of experts in multilateral forums. Consideration should be given to promoting regular institutional dialogue with broad participation, and to expanding and supporting practices in cooperation among computer emergency response teams and cybersecurity incident response teams. With respect to the proposed establishment of a comprehensive list of points of contact, points of contact should be designated at different levels, for example, one point of contact at the political and diplomatic level, and others at the technical level (policymakers, offices of attorneys general, computer emergency response teams, etc.). It will be important to determine who will manage information and ensure that it is kept up to date. The development of a protocol for clear and open management of information, including databases, should be con sidered. 20/84 20-08285