(2) If the fine cannot be enforced from the property of the legal entity, because the legal entity has no such property or has ceased to exist before the enforcement of the fine, the fine shall be enforced from its legal successor, and if there is no legal successor from the property of the founder or the founders of the legal entity, in proportion to their invested shares, i.e. in the cases determined by law at a trade company from the property of the stockholders, i.e. partners, in proportion to their shares, provided that they have prevented or hindered the enforcement of the fine by their decisions or actions. (3) The fine for foreign legal entities shall be enforced from property confiscated in the Republic of Macedonia or by applying an international agreement ratified in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia from the property abroad. Conditional postponement of enforcement of a fine Article 96-l (1) The court can appoint conditional postponement of enforcement of a fine or sentences that consist of prohibitions or revoking of permit, license, concession, authorization or other right determined by separate law in a period of one to three years when a crime, wherefore a fine or imprisonment sentence of up to three years is prescribed, has been committed, should the legal entity ensure enforcement of a fine in case of revoking the conditional conviction. (2) The conditional conviction shall be revoked if within the control period another crime has been committed, or if an earlier committed crime by the legal entity is revealed or if the legal entity in the determined time period by the court does not ensure enforcement of the fine. (3) The conditional conviction can be revoked during the control period, and if the legal entity during that period commits another crime being confirmed by a verdict after the expiry of the control period, the conditional conviction can be revoked at latest within a period of one year as of the day the control period has expired. Confiscation of property and property benefit and seizing objects Article 96-m (1) For confiscation of property and property benefit obtained with a crime by the legal entity, the provisions of Articles 97 through 100 of this Code shall be properly applied. (2) If no property or property benefit can be confiscated from the legal entity since it has ceased to exist before the confiscation, the legal successor, i.e. successors, and in case there are no legal successors, the founder or the founders of the legal entity, i.e. the stockholders or partners in a trade company in the cases determined by law shall jointly oblige to pay the monetary amount that corresponds to the acquired property benefit. 43/217