to the administration of justice, a defense attorney or agent of any person in connection with their activity related to legal assistance, or a foreign representative (Articles 112, 348, 379, 400 and 443), intended grievous bodily injury (Article 121, paragraph 3 of Articles 345, 346, 350, 377 and 398), intended bodily injury of medium gravity (Article 122, paragraph 2 of Articles 345, 346, 350, 377 and 398), sabotage (Article 113), gansterism (Article 257), act of terrorism (Article 258), hostage taking (Articles 147 and 348), rape (Article 152), violent unnatural satisfaction of sexual desire (Article 153), theft (sections 185, paragraph 1 of Articles 262 and 308), robbery (Articles 186, 262 and 308), brigandage (Article 187, paragraph 3 of Articles 262 and 308), extortion (Article 189, 262 and 308), willful destruction or endamagement of property (paragraph 2 of Articles 194, 347, 352 and 378, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 399), endamagement of communication routes and means of transportation (Article 277), theft or seizure of railroad rolling stock, air-, sea- or river-craft (Article 278), misappropriation of transportation (paragraph 2 and 3 of Article 289), and hooliganism (Article 296). Chapter V. GUILT AND ITS FORMS Article 23. Guilt Guilt shall mean a mental stance of a person in regard to the performed act or omission under this Code and to the consequences thereof, as expressed in the form of intent or recklessness. Article 24. Intent and its forms 1. An intent may be direct or indirect. 2. The intent is direct where a person was conscious of the socially injurious nature of his/her act (action or omission), anticipated its socially injurious consequences, and wished them. 3. The intent is indirect where a person was conscious of the socially injurious nature of his/her act (action or omission), foresaw its socially injurious consequences, and anticipated, though did not wish them. Article 25. Recklessness and its types 1. Recklessness subdivides into criminal presumption and criminal negligence. 2. Recklessness is held to be criminal presumption where a person anticipated that his/her act (action or omission) may have socially injurious consequences but carelessly expected to avoid them. 3. Recklessness is held to be criminal negligence where a person did not anticipate that his/her act (action or omission) may have socially injurious consequences, although ought to and could anticipate them. Chapter VI. COMPLICITY Article 26. The notion of complicity Criminal complicity is the willful co-participation of several criminal offenders in an intended criminal offense. Article 27. Types of accomplices