(1) compulsory outpatient psychiatric assistance; (2) hospitalization in a regular-security mental institution; (3) hospitalization in a reinforced-security mental institution; (4) hospitalization in a high-security mental institution; 2. A court may order compulsory outpatient psychiatric assistance in respect of a mentally sick person who committed an socially dangerous act, if the condition of the person does not necessitate inpatient treatment in a mental institution. 3. A court may order hospitalization in a regular-security mental institution in respect of a mentally sick person whose mental condition and the nature of his/her socially dangerous act necessitates custody in a mental institution and compulsory treatment. 4. A court may order hospitalization in a reinforced-security mental institution in respect of a mentally sick person who committed a socially dangerous act that involved no trespass against lives of other persons and whose mental condition is not dangerous to the public but necessitates custody in a mental institution and treatment in conditions of reinforced security. 5. A court may order hospitalization in a high-security mental institution in respect of a mentally sick person who committed a socially dangerous act that involved a trespass against lives of other persons and whose mental condition and the nature of his/her socially dangerous act pose an increased hazard to the public and necessitate custody in a mental institution and treatment in conditions of high security. 6. If compulsory medical measures are found not to be necessary or are discontinued, a court may place a mentally sick person under care of relatives or custodians on condition of a compulsory medical follow-up. Article 95. Continuation, change or discontinuation of compulsory medical measures 1. Continuation, change or discontinuation of compulsory medical measures shall be ordered by a court upon a motion of a representative of the mental institution (psychiatrist), who provides psychiatric assistance to a person, together with am appended opinion of a panel of psychiatrists, which states the reasons for continuation, change or discontinuation of any compulsory measures. 2. Persons subjected to compulsory medical measures shall be examined at least once every six months by a panel of psychiatrists who shall determine any reasons that may justify a court motion seeking discontinuation or change of any such measures. If no reasons are found, which justify the discontinuation or change of a compulsory medical measures, a representative of a mental institution (psychiatrist) who provides psychiatric assistance to the person, shall file an application with a court, together with an opinion of the panel of psychiatrists, which provides reasons for continuation of compulsory medical measures. If compulsory medical measures need to be extended beyond a six-month period, a representative of a mental institution (psychiatrist) who provides psychiatric assistance to the person, shall file with a local court an application for extension of compulsory measures. The application shall be accompanied with an opinion of a panel of psychiatrists, which provides reasons for the need to continue psychiatric assistance to the person. Every further extension of compulsory medical measures may not exceed six months.