1 INTRODUCTION From homes to hospitals, the power grid, the highway, and the high seas, the Internet of Things (IoT) is destined to change the way people live, do business, and interact with their governments. The IoT's massive interconnections of devices, or "things”, lead to new efficiencies and capabilities, and unlock tremendous value for consumers, organisations and governments. Imagine an intelligent hospital system that links patient monitoring devices with drug infusion pumps to prevent overdoses and reduce false alarms. Or a smart city that automatically schedules maintenance work to minimise street blockages and uses smart lighting to de-escalate conflict situations in real time13. Or connected farms that control their irrigation systems based on the moisture content of the soil and on the weather forecast, all the while deriving algorithmic insights into optimal ways to grow and water crops. IoT is one of the key enabling technologies to realise these visions. The number of IoT devices in operation continues to grow exponentially. Gartner forecasts that the number of connected things in use globally will surge from 8.4 billion in 2017 to 20.4 billion by 2020, with total spending on endpoints and services exceeding $2 trillion.14 Smart cities and smart nations15 are enabled by the adoption of IoT along with related technologies such as cloud computing and big data analytics. These technologies can improve government operations, support better living, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 create new business opportunities, and support stronger and safer communities. But the aforementioned opportunities come with enormous challenges. Beckstrom’s Law of Cybersecurity16 is a recent Internet aphorism that, slightly paraphrased, states the following: 1. Anything attached to a network can be hacked. 2. Everything is being attached to a network. 3. Therefore, everything can be hacked. This pronouncement has proven largely accurate. In December 2015, VTech, a manufacturer of educational toys such as electronic learning devices, announced a security breach exposing the personal data of over 6 million people.17 Reports suggested that the breach exploited a SQL injection vulnerability at the server and that the account registration services did not use encrypted communication.18 The devices themselves were not compromised; however, the online services that the devices connected to were not sufficiently secured. On October 21, 2016, multiple distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks targeted Domain Name System (DNS) provider Dyn, causing major Internet platforms and services to be unavailable to users in Europe and North America.19 The attack was accomplished by issuing a large number of DNS lookup requests from as many as 600,000 Internet-connected devices20 – such as printers, IP cameras, residential gateways and baby monitors – that were infected with the https://www.tue.nl/en/our-university/departments/built-environment/research/smart-cities-program/collaboration/living-labs/stratumseind/ https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917 https://www.smartnation.sg – Singapore Smart Nation website. https://dld-conference.com/articles/its-a-mad-mad-mad-cyber-world https://www.vtech.com/en/press_release/2018/faq-about-cyber-attack-on-vtech-learning-lodge/ https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34963686 https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/21/13362354/dyn-dns-ddos-attack-cause-outage-status-explained https://blog.cloudflare.com/inside-mirai-the-infamous-iot-botnet-a-retrospective-analysis/ 11

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents